However, this doctrine has gradually diminished. While frontline communities were once viewed as a security asset, they have increasingly become a liability. Nowadays, these communities are often evacuated even before the commencement of a full-scale campaign, as exemplified by the current situation with communities along the Lebanese border. Retired General Gershon HaCohen identifies a primary factor for this shift: the rise of liberal democratic principles in state institutions. These principles, which emphasize the distinction between civilian and military roles, have taken precedence over socialist ideals that prioritize individual contributions to the collective effort.
The necessity to revise Israel's spatial defense doctrine in frontline communities arises from the changing nature of the security threats. Iran and its proxies, including Hamas, have developed a military strategy not aimed at achieving military victory, but rather at undermining the Israeli spirit. They perceive the Israeli social fabric as vulnerable, believing that a prolonged conflict will lead to the disintegration of Israeli society. An updated spatial defense doctrine could enhance resilience by integrating the security responsibilities of residents in conflict zones with their living environments and livelihoods, thereby making them more resistant to the strains of prolonged warfare.
The updated spatial defense doctrine should represent a renewed social contract between the State and the residents of frontline communities. This contract should not only focus on the state's obligations to its citizens, as is commonly discussed, but also acknowledge that life in Israel necessitates a 'citizenship' mindset characterized by a pioneering spirit and a dedication to taking action beyond legal obligations.
Thus, spatial defense transcends mere military strategy; it embodies contemporary Zionism, intertwining national security with national and communal resilience, local leadership, and individual volunteerism. By adopting this approach, it becomes possible to maintain social cohesion, strengthen national resilience, and counteract the strategies of the Iranian adversary.